
GRID M6-1Q
Popular choices:

GeForce 945M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-1Q is positioned at rank 326 and the GeForce 945M is on rank 100, so the GeForce 945M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-1Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 945M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 945M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M6-1Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 945M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 945M holds the technical lead. Priced at $98 (vs $100), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($98) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-1Q and GeForce 945M

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

GeForce 945M
The GeForce 945M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,109 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the GeForce 945M reaches 2,109 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce 945M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 640 (GeForce 945M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 945M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1020 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069 | 2,109+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+269% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+15% | 1020 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 945M has 512 MB. The GRID M6-1Q offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 945M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 945M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (GeForce 945M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 28.1+205% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 945M costs 2% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 21.5 (GeForce 945M) — the GeForce 945M offers 3.9% better value.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $98-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 21.5+4% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #671 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












