
GRID M6-1Q

Radeon RX 540
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon RX 540 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon RX 540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon RX 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M6-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1415.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 540
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1462.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GRID M6-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 540 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon RX 540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Radeon RX 540 reaches 2,134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 512 (Radeon RX 540). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069 | 2,134+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+287% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1219 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 540 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID M6-1Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 540 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 540 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 540. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 540) — the GRID M6-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 540). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 540's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 42.7+364% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M6-1Q came in at $1500, while the Radeon RX 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 540 was 93.4% cheaper ($1401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 21.6 (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 1442.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 540 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $99-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 21.6+1443% |
| Codename | GM204 | Lexa |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #525 | #602 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














