
GRID M6-1Q

Radeon TM R9 A360
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M6-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
Radeon TM R9 A360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M6-1Q vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069 | 2,060 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+409% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+27% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M6-1Q and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the GRID M6-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 68.7+647% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M6-1Q came in at $1500, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon TM R9 A360 was 100+% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Tropo |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #525 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














