GRID M60-1Q
T400
GRID M60-1Q vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-1Q vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID M60-1Q vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1288.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,320 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1256.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GRID M60-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-1Q vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID M60-1Q
The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1Q scores 3,695 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-1Q | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,695+2% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+341% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1425 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1Q | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 carries 4 GB. T400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-1Q and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1 MB (T400) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-1Q | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1Q draws 225W versus the T400's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1Q) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-1Q | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 16.4 | 120.3+634% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-1Q came in at $2500, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, T400 was 92.8% cheaper ($2320 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 20.1 (T400) — the T400 offers 1240% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-1Q | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $180-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 20.1+1240% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #525 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M60-1Q and T400
