GRID P40-6Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-6Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-6Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-6Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P40-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌3114.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 225W, a 218W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (905 vs 889), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P40-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P40-6Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID P40-6Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU reaches 889 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
G3D Mark Score	905+2%	889
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-6Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU carries 0 MB. GRID P40-6Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P40-6Q and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU's 7W — a 187.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
TDP	225W	7W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	4.0	127.0+3075%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-6Q came in at $3000, while the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($3000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GRID P40-6Q) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
MSRP	$3000	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	Infinity
Codename	GK104	—
Release	June 28 2013	December 6 2018
Ranking	#628	#916

Search GRID P40-6Q on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.