HD Graphics 6000 vs GRID M10-0B
HD Graphics 6000
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-0B offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The HD Graphics 6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 6000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $1,000), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 9923% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9923%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 6000 and GRID M10-0B
HD Graphics 6000
The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.
GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 6000 scores 873 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 6000 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 873 | 871 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1306 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 6000 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-0B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-0B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 6000 draws 15W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 6000) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 58.2+1392% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 6000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The HD Graphics 6000 costs 99% less ($990 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.3 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the HD Graphics 6000 offers 9600% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-99% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3+9600% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | GM107 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #924 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 6000 and GRID M10-0B
