HD Graphics 6000 vs HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 6000
Popular choices:
HD Graphics 520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.
| Insight | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The HD Graphics 6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 6000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $35), it costs 71% less, resulting in a 254.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+254.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 6000 and HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 6000
The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.
HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 6000 scores 873 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 6000 is built on Generation 8.0 while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 384 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 873+1% | 861 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS+111% | 0.3456 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz+6% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 6+100% | 3 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 6000 draws 15W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 0% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 6000) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 58.2+1% | 57.4 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 6000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 and now averages $35. The HD Graphics 6000 costs 71.4% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.3 (HD Graphics 6000) vs 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 6000 offers 254.9% better value. The HD Graphics 520 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | HD Graphics 6000 | HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-71% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3+255% | 24.6 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #924 | #929 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 6000 and HD Graphics 520
