Intel Arc Pro B50 vs RTX A4000H
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $349 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 62% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 174.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+174.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($349) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and RTX A4000H
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208+3% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+80% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+107% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $349, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000 and now averages $927. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 62.4% less ($578 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.7 (RTX A4000H) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 175.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $349-62% | $927 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+176% | 12.7 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA104 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #221 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B50 and RTX A4000H
