Intel Arc Pro B50
RTX A4000H
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 241mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅51.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌186.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
- ❌44.3% longer card at 241mm vs 167mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B50 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208+3% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+80% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B50 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+107% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B50 came in at $349, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B50 was 65.1% cheaper ($651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 196.6% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-65% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0+197% | 11.8 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA104 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #221 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B50 and RTX A4000H
