Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 430 OEM

2016Core: 730 MHzBoost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 430 OEM

2016

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R5 430 OEM is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,231 vs 1,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 430 OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R5 430 OEM has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 430 OEM

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R5 430 OEM uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Radeon R5 430 OEM
G3D Mark Score
1,231+3%
1,200
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
28 nm
Shading Units
184
384+109%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
0.599 TFLOPS+42%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+47%
780 MHz
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
23
24+4%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Radeon R5 430 OEM
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 OEM carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 430 OEM gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and System on the Radeon R5 430 OEM.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Radeon R5 430 OEM
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 430 OEM's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Radeon R5 430 OEM
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
250W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Perf/Watt
82.1+242%
24.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP
$0
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
Oland
Release
October 1 2017
June 30 2016
Ranking
#824
#874

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.