UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M270X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M270X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,231 vs 1,204), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M270X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M270X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 630 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score	1,231+2%	1,204
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm+++	28 nm
Shading Units	184	640+248%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4232 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+134%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+48%	775 MHz
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	23	40+74%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M270X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M270X
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Perf/Watt	82.1+410%	16.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP	$0-100%	$250
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	4.8
Codename	Comet Lake GT2	Venus
Release	October 1 2017	March 21 2014
Ranking	#824	#819

Search Intel UHD Graphics 630 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M270X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.