
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2023-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
2017UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics 630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- β More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021β2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2023-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel UHD Graphics 630 better than UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) make more sense than Intel UHD Graphics 630?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) uses Gen. 12, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 750 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,231+3% | 1,200 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 184+667% | 24 |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+53% | 750 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)'s 15W β a 0% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 82.1+3% | 80.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) β the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers NaN% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | Alder Lake Xe |
| Release | October 1 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #824 | #914 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













