Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

2020Core: 200 MHzBoost: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 7W.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

2020

Why buy it

  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 7W instead of 15W, a 8W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,231 vs 1,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 scores 1,231 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 500 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
G3D Mark Score
1,231+3%
1,200
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
14 nm+++
10 nm
Shading Units
184+188%
64
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+130%
500 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and System on the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 72.7% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
TDP
15W
7W-53%
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
82.1
171.4+109%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 630 came in at $0, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
Lakefield GT2
Release
October 1 2017
May 28 2020
Ranking
#824
#893

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.