
Intel UHD Graphics 710 vs Firepro M4100

Intel UHD Graphics 710
Popular choices:

Firepro M4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Intel UHD Graphics 710 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro M4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Firepro M4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 710.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Firepro M4100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 710 and Firepro M4100

Intel UHD Graphics 710
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 scores 1,052 and the Firepro M4100 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Firepro M4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 384 (Firepro M4100). Raw compute: 0.3328 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,052 | 1,059 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.3328 TFLOPS | 0.5146 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Firepro M4100 has 2 GB. The Firepro M4100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 draws 15W versus the Firepro M4100's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 350W (Firepro M4100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 70mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1+99% | 35.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Firepro M4100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 35.3 (Firepro M4100) — the Intel UHD Graphics 710 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 35.3 |
| Codename | Alder Lake GT1 | Mars |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #855 | #866 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















