Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs FirePro W600
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Popular choices:
FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The Intel UHD Graphics 750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and FirePro W600
Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 1,702 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,702 | 1,695 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+15% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The FirePro W600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 draws 15W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 113.5+402% | 22.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 750 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 56.5 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 30 2021 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #722 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 750 and FirePro W600
