Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 750.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 1,702 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on a 14 nm+++ process. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,702 | 1,729+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+24% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 113.5 | 115.3+2% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | March 30 2021 | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #722 | #723 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Iris Plus Graphics 655
