GeForce GT 755M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 750

GeForce GT 755M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 750

2021Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 755M is positioned at rank #4 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M

#4
GeForce GT 755M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
94%
#8
86%
#9
85%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
78%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
77%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Intel UHD Graphics 750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 755M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 750.

InsightGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 755M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Intel UHD Graphics 750

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M

The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 750

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 reaches 1,702 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
G3D Mark Score
1,726+1%
1,702
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 12.1
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS+13%
0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+100%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 755M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
34.5
113.5+229%
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755MIntel UHD Graphics 750
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
Codename
GK107
Rocket Lake GT1
Release
June 25 2013
March 30 2021
Ranking
#726
#722