UHD Graphics 750 vs Quadro 5010M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 750

15

1,702

+0.7%

1,691

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M

#4

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

262%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

62%

#19

Quadro 5010M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

79%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

71%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics 750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5010M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5010M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 750	Quadro 5010M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 750 Benchmark Check

Quadro 5010M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Quadro 5010M

Intel UHD Graphics 750

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 1,702 and the Quadro 5010M reaches 1,691 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro 5010M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 384 (Quadro 5010M). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 750	Quadro 5010M
G3D Mark Score	1,702	1,691
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm+++	40 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6656 TFLOPS	0.6912 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	48+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 750	Quadro 5010M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5010M has 4 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 750	Quadro 5010M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 draws 15W versus the Quadro 5010M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 350W (Quadro 5010M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.