
Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Quadro P400

Intel UHD Graphics 750
Popular choices:

Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Quadro P400

Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 1,702 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,702+3% | 1,659 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6656 TFLOPS+4% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+4% | 1252 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 has 2 GB. The Quadro P400 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 draws 15W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 113.5+105% | 55.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169 and now averages $60. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) vs 27.6 (Quadro P400) — the Intel UHD Graphics 750 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 27.6 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Release | March 30 2021 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #722 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















