
Intel UHD Graphics vs FirePro V8700

Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:

FirePro V8700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V8700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V8700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V8700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and FirePro V8700

Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.

FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 and the FirePro V8700 reaches 1,539 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the FirePro V8700 uses TeraScale 3, both on 10 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 1,280 (FirePro V8700). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,511 | 1,539+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 10 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1280+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS+383% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V8700 has 4 GB. The FirePro V8700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the FirePro V8700's 150W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 350W (FirePro V8700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-93% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 151.1+1367% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V8700 launched at $1499 and now averages $170. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 9.1 (FirePro V8700) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.1 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | Cayman |
| Release | January 11 2021 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #666 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















