UHD Graphics vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics Benchmark Check

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Intel UHD Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 10 nm+ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
G3D Mark Score	1,511	1,538+2%
Architecture	Generation 11.0	Generation 8.0
Process Node	10 nm+	14 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.8448 TFLOPS+120%
Boost Clock	750 MHz	1100 MHz+47%
ROPs	8+33%	6
TMUs	16	48+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 40% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
TDP	10W-33%	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Perf/Watt	151.1+47%	102.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
MSRP	$0	$0
Avg Price (30d)	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	Jasper Lake GT1	Broadwell GT3e
Release	January 11 2021	September 5 2014
Ranking	#666	#763