
Intel UHD Graphics vs GRID M10-1B

Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:

GRID M10-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Intel UHD Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-1B offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and GRID M10-1B

Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.

GRID M10-1B
The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 10 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,511 | 1,504 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+1157% |
| Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 1178 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-1B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 183% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-96% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 151.1+2155% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $150. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 10.0 (GRID M10-1B) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GRID M10-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.0 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | GM204 |
| Release | January 11 2021 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #666 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















