Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,729 | 1,726 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 0.8333 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.3+234% | 34.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 34.5 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | GK107 |
| Release | April 3 2018 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #723 | #925 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 655 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
