Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,729), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
1,729
1,789+3%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Generation 11.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8064 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+5%
1000 MHz
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+50%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: QuickSync vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder
QuickSync
Quick Sync 7
Decoder
QuickSync
Quick Sync 7
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
115.3
119.3+3%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 came in at $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers NaN% better value.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Iris Plus Graphics 950
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Coffee Lake GT3e
Ice Lake GT2
Release
April 3 2018
sem dados
Ranking
#723
#634

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.