
Iris Plus Graphics 655

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,729 | 1,789+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+5% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: QuickSync vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.3 | 119.3+3% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 came in at $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 3 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #723 | #634 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















