
Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R6 M340DX

Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:

Radeon R6 M340DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R6 M340DX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R6 M340DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R6 M340DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R6 M340DX

Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Radeon R6 M340DX
The Radeon R6 M340DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 955 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Radeon R6 M340DX reaches 1,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R6 M340DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 384 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 0.791 TFLOPS (Radeon R6 M340DX). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,729 | 1,800+4% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS+2% | 0.791 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+2% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R6 M340DX has 512 MB. The Radeon R6 M340DX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12_0 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Radeon R6 M340DX's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 350W (Radeon R6 M340DX). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 115.3+92% | 60.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R6 M340DX launched at $0 and now averages $10. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 180.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 180.0 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | Jet |
| Release | April 3 2018 | December 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #723 | #852 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















