Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,729), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Iris Plus Graphics is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
G3D Mark Score
1,789+3%
1,729
Architecture
Generation 11.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+27%
0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1050 MHz+5%
ROPs
8+33%
6
TMUs
32
48+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
Encoder
QuickSync
QuickSync
Decoder
QuickSync
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
119.3+3%
115.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 655 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsIris Plus Graphics 655
MSRP
$100
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
17.9
Infinity
Codename
Ice Lake GT2
Coffee Lake GT3e
Release
sem dados
April 3 2018
Ranking
#714
#723

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.