
Iris Plus Graphics

Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789+3% | 1,729 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+27% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Decoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+3% | 115.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 655 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | sem dados | April 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #714 | #723 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















