GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

2017Core: 1122 MHzBoost: 1242 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX130 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX130 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.4% in PassMark G3D (1,805 vs 1,729), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 655
G3D Mark Score
1,805+4%
1,729
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9539 TFLOPS+18%
0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1242 MHz+18%
1050 MHz
ROPs
8+33%
6
TMUs
24
48+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 655
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX130 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 carries 0 MB. GeForce MX130 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX130 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 655
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
40 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 655
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
60.2
115.3+92%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX130 came in at $120, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 655 was 100+% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX130) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 655
MSRP
$120
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
Infinity
Codename
GM108
Coffee Lake GT3e
Release
November 17 2017
April 3 2018
Ranking
#713
#723

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.