GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

2013Core: 657 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,729 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 655 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 655 reaches 1,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MIris Plus Graphics 655
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,729
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS+25%
0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1050 MHz+60%
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
64+33%
48

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MIris Plus Graphics 655
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 655 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 655.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MIris Plus Graphics 655
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 655's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MIris Plus Graphics 655
TDP
55W
15W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
31.4
115.3+267%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MIris Plus Graphics 655
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK106
Coffee Lake GT3e
Release
May 30 2013
April 3 2018
Ranking
#725
#723

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.