
GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M465X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 760M is positioned at rank 97 and the Radeon R7 M465X is on rank 342, so the GeForce GTX 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M465X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 8.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X

GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon R7 M465X
The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,787+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+7% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 925 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 760M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+32% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760M costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 39.7 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the GeForce GTX 760M offers 8.6% better value. The Radeon R7 M465X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-11% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1+9% | 39.7 |
| Codename | GK106 | Tropo |
| Release | May 30 2013 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #725 | #715 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















