GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M465X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

✅45.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M465X instead at 1,787 vs 1,726, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M465X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M465X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,787+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS+7%	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	657 MHz	925 MHz+41%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	64 KB	128 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M465X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 760M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon R7 M465X
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	31.4+32%	23.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M465X (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GK106	Tropo
Release	May 30 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#725	#715

Search GeForce GTX 760M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.