GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 760M is positioned at rank #97 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 760M is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $40 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 760M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760M and Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,789+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1000 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 760M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 15W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 119.3+280% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 3.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1 | 44.7+4% |
| Codename | GK106 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #725 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760M and Iris Plus Graphics
