GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

2013Core: 657 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

  • 30.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M375X

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,726 vs 1,711), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M375X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M375X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1015 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R9 M375X
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,711
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS
1.299 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1015 MHz+54%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
64+60%
40
L1 Cache
64 KB
160 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M375X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R9 M375X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375X.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R9 M375X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R9 M375X
TDP
55W-27%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Perf/Watt
31.4+38%
22.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R9 M375X
MSRP
$250
Codename
GK106
Tropo
Release
May 30 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#725
#727

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.