GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018

Why buy it

✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (1,769 vs 1,726), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,769+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768+9%	704
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+75%
Boost Clock	657 MHz	1251 MHz+90%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	64+45%	44

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M and System on the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 44.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
TDP	55W	35W-36%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Integrated
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	31.4	50.5+61%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK106	Raven
Release	May 30 2013	May 10 2018
Ranking	#725	#673

Search GeForce GTX 760M on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.