
GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 760M is positioned at rank #97 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 31.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon HD 7750

GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+1% | 1,703 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+23% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 800 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 72 GB/s (Radeon HD 7750) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s+11% | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+1% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 56.8 (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 31.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 760M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1 | 56.8+32% |
| Codename | GK106 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 30 2013 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #725 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















