GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 760M

2 GB 55

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Shared System RAM 15

1,789

+3.7%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2013 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Plus Graphics 950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,789+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock	657 MHz	1000 MHz+52%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	64+100%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.