GeForce GTX 760M vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 760M

55

1,726

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Iris Plus Graphics 950

15

1,789

+3.7%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 760M is positioned at rank #97 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

99%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#87

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

252%

#89

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

228%

#90

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

227%

#94

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

207%

#95

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

205%

#97

GeForce GTX 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

98%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

96%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

95%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 760M is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760M Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760M and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score	1,726	1,789+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock	657 MHz	1000 MHz+52%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	64+100%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 760M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760M	Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP	55W	15W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Integrated
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	31.4	119.3+280%

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.