Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 655.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,729 | 1,789+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+5% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Decoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 115.3 | 119.3+3% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 44.7 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 3 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #723 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Iris Plus Graphics
