Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 670M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Plus Graphics 655

15

1,729

+0.9%

Iris Graphics 6100

HD Graphics 630

HD Graphics P530

Iris Plus Graphics 650

1,714

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#139

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

317%

#141

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

287%

#142

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

286%

#146

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

260%

#147

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

259%

#149

GeForce GTX 670M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

98%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Iris Plus Graphics 655 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 670M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 670M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 655 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 670M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and GeForce GTX 670M

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the GeForce GTX 670M reaches 1,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 670M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 670M). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
G3D Mark Score	1,729	1,714
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm+++	40 nm
Shading Units	384+14%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS	0.8037 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	24+300%
TMUs	48	56+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	3 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 655	GeForce GTX 670M
Encoder	QuickSync	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 670M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.