
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:

FirePro V7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $96 for the FirePro V7800, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 531.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+531.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and FirePro V7800

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the FirePro V7800 reaches 2,028 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the FirePro V7800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7800).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 2,028+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 1280+1900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs None (FirePro V7800). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | None |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the FirePro V7800's 150W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 350W (FirePro V7800). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 254mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-92% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 254mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+1135% | 13.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $96. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 84.4% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 21.1 (FirePro V7800) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 531.8% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $759 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-84% | $96 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+532% | 21.1 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Cayman |
| Release | May 28 2019 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #672 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















