Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Quadro P520
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Quadro P520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 883.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+883.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Quadro P520
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 2,034+2% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Pascal |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 384+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1493 MHz+36% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 has 4 GB. The Quadro P520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 40% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-33% | 18W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+48% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro P520 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 13.6 (Quadro P520) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 880.1% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+880% | 13.6 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GP108 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | May 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #672 | #677 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Quadro P520
