GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1233.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 12W.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 12W instead of 160W, a 148W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (2,016 vs 2,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
G3D Mark Score
2,016
2,000
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
336+425%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 460 v2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 v2 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Encoder
Legacy
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 172.1% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
TDP
160W
12W-93%
Recommended PSU
450W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
210mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
12.6
166.7+1223%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 came in at $199, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.1 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
MSRP
$199
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
10.1
Infinity
Codename
GF114
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Release
September 24 2011
May 28 2019
Ranking
#679
#672

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.