GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M385

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011

Why buy it

  • 7.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 47.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 v2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 10.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M385 instead at 2,061 vs 2,016, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.5% (10.1 vs 6.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Radeon R9 M385
G3D Mark Score
2,016
2,061+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
336
896+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.046 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
448 KB+100%
224 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M385 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Radeon R9 M385
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 v2 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Radeon R9 M385
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
96 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Radeon R9 M385
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
12.6
27.5+118%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 v2 was 33.7% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.1 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 46.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M385 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Radeon R9 M385
MSRP
$199-34%
$300
Performance per Dollar
10.1+46%
6.9
Codename
GF114
Strato
Release
September 24 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#679
#674

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.