GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 5000M

2010Core: 405 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.

Quadro 5000M

2010

Why buy it

  • 5.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (2,060 vs 2,016), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 v2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 5000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

Quadro 5000M

The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the Quadro 5000M reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro 5000M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 320 (Quadro 5000M). Raw compute: 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Quadro 5000M
G3D Mark Score
2,016
2,060+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
336+5%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.046 TFLOPS+102%
0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
448 KB
640 KB+43%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 5000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Quadro 5000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000M carries 2 GB. Quadro 5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 v2 and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 512 KB (Quadro 5000M) — the Quadro 5000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Quadro 5000M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the Quadro 5000M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro 5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 350W (Quadro 5000M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Quadro 5000M
TDP
160W
100W-38%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
12.6
20.6+63%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460 v2 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2Quadro 5000M
MSRP
$199
Codename
GF114
GF100
Release
September 24 2011
July 27 2010
Ranking
#679
#675

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.