GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro P520

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz

Quadro P520

2019Core: 1303 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 460 v2

160

2,016

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2,034

+0.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P520

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

98%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

94%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

93%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

92%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

91%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

89%

#96

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1089%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

96%

#117

Radeon Pro 580X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

93%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

93%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

92%

#124

Radeon Pro W5500X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

90%

#125

Quadro T2000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $75

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P520 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Quadro P520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Insight	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Quadro P520, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 197.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+197.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 v2 Benchmark Check

Quadro P520 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro P520

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the Quadro P520 reaches 2,034 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
G3D Mark Score	2,016	2,034
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	336	384+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.046 TFLOPS	1.147 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	448 KB+211%	144 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 has 4 GB. The Quadro P520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 512 KB (Quadro P520) — the Quadro P520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 159.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro P520
TDP	160W	18W-89%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	12.6	113.0+797%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro P520 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 13.6 (Quadro P520) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 196.3% better value. The Quadro P520 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).