
FirePro V7800 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

FirePro V7800
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7800 is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 v2.
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $96), it costs 48% less, resulting in a 90.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7800 and GeForce GTX 460 v2

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

GeForce GTX 460 v2
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the GeForce GTX 460 v2 reaches 2,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028 | 2,016 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+281% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+77% | 1.046 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7800) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (FL 11_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4+7% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 v2).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Legacy |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 460 v2's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro V7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5+7% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $96, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 costs 47.9% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.1 (FirePro V7800) vs 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 91% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $199-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $96 | $50-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 40.3+91% |
| Codename | Cayman | GF114 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | September 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #656 | #679 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













