FirePro V7800 vs Quadro 5000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7800 vs Quadro 5000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7800 vs Quadro 5000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7800
2011Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010β2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quadro 5000M
2010Why buy it
- β Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7800 vs Quadro 5000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Quadro 5000M
The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Quadro 5000M reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro 5000M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 320 (Quadro 5000M). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028 | 2,060+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+300% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+258% | 0.5184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 640 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000M carries 2 GB. FirePro V7800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000M.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Quadro 5000M's 100W β a 40% difference. The Quadro 5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 350W (Quadro 5000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 20.6+53% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro V7800 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | β |
| Codename | Cayman | GF100 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | July 27 2010 |
| Ranking | #656 | #675 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















