
FirePro V7800

Iris Pro Graphics P580
FirePro V7800 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7800 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7800 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7800
2011Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Iris Pro Graphics P580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V7800 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β406% HIGHER MSRP$759 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $609 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- β Delivers 405.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7800 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Iris Pro Graphics P580 reaches 2,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028 | 2,026 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 1280+122% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+53% | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+256% | 9 |
| TMUs | 80+11% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 carries 0 MB. FirePro V7800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W β a 163.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 135.1+901% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7800 came in at $759, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics P580 was 80.2% cheaper ($609 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro V7800) vs 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) β the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics P580 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $150-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 13.5+400% |
| Codename | Cayman | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | May 24 2011 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #678 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















