Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Performance Spectrum

FirePro V7800
4 GB 150
2,028
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 4850 X2
brand logoRadeon HD 5770
brand logoRadeon 630
brand logoRadeon R7 M465X
brand logoRadeon RX Vega M GH
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon TM R9 A360
2 GB 30
2,060
+1.6%
brand logoRadeon R7 A8-7690K
brand logoRadeon HD 7850M
brand logoRadeon Vega 9
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 285
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7600S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7800

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
  • ❌25300% longer card at 254mm vs 1mm.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 254mm, a 253mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $759 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon TM R9 A360 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (2,060 vs 2,028), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon TM R9 A360 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360).

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score
2,028
2,060+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+150%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+96%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 carries 2 GB. FirePro V7800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7800) vs 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
DirectX
11.2
12_0+7%
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
1mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
13.5
68.7+409%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V7800 came in at $759, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon TM R9 A360 was 100+% cheaper ($759 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro V7800) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon TM R9 A360 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP
$759
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
Infinity
Codename
Cayman
Tropo
Release
May 24 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#656
#711
Search FirePro V7800 on AmazonSearch Radeon TM R9 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.