
FirePro V7800
Popular choices:

Radeon TM R9 A360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7800 is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon TM R9 A360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $96), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 387.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+387.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7800 and Radeon TM R9 A360

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028 | 2,060+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+150% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+96% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 has 2 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7800) vs 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 68.7+409% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $96, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 79.2% less ($76 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.1 (FirePro V7800) vs 103.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 388.2% better value. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $96 | $20-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 103.0+388% |
| Codename | Cayman | Tropo |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















