FirePro V7800
VS
Radeon TM R9 A360

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7800 is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#240
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#256
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#258
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#259
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#260
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#263
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#264
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#265
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#266
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#267
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#268
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#269
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#270
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon TM R9 A360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $96), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 387.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+387.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7800 and Radeon TM R9 A360

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

AMD

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360).

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score
2,028
2,060+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+150%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS+96%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 has 2 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7800) vs 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
DirectX
11.2
12_0+7%
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
13.5
68.7+409%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $96, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 79.2% less ($76 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.1 (FirePro V7800) vs 103.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 388.2% better value. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V7800Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP
$759
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$96
$20-79%
Performance per Dollar
21.1
103.0+388%
Codename
Cayman
Tropo
Release
May 24 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#656
#711