FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 M385

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 M385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 M385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7800

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
153% HIGHER MSRP
$759 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $459 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
✅Delivers 157.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M385 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (2,061 vs 2,028), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M385 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $459 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $759, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 157.1% (6.9 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M385 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V7800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V7800 vs Radeon R9 M385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385).

Feature	FirePro V7800	Radeon R9 M385
G3D Mark Score	2,028	2,061+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+4%	1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	320 KB+43%	224 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V7800	Radeon R9 M385
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V7800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V7800	Radeon R9 M385
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M385 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro V7800	Radeon R9 M385
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	13.5	27.5+104%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V7800 came in at $759, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M385 was 60.5% cheaper ($459 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro V7800) vs 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 155.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M385 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V7800	Radeon R9 M385
MSRP	$759	$300-60%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	6.9+156%
Codename	Cayman	Strato
Release	May 24 2011	May 5 2015
Ranking	#656	#674

Search FirePro V7800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M385 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.