GeForce GTX 460 v2
VS
GeForce GTX 765M

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 765M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 765M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 863 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M

#99
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
270%
#101
244%
#102
244%
#106
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
222%
#107
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
220%
#109
GeForce GTX 765M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
100%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
97%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
95%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
95%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
95%
#119
GeForce 825M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#121
Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48
94%
#123
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 765M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 765M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
G3D Mark Score
2,016
2,014
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
336
768+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.046 TFLOPS
1.326 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
56
64+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB+600%
64 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 765M) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 765M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
Encoder
Legacy
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 765M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.6
26.9+113%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 765M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 v2GeForce GTX 765M
MSRP
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GF114
GK106
Release
September 24 2011
May 30 2013
Ranking
#679
#680