Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Performance Spectrum

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Shared System RAM 12
2,000
+0.8%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Shared System RAM 45
1,985
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Iris Pro Graphics 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 12W instead of 45W, a 33W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌275% higher power demand at 45W vs 12W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (2,000 vs 1,985), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
G3D Mark Score
2,000
1,985
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Generation 9.0
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
64
576+800%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz+16%
950 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: QuickSync vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
Encoder
QuickSync
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
QuickSync
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 115.8% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
TDP
12W-73%
45W
Recommended PSU
1W
0W-100%
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
80-6%
Perf/Watt
166.7+278%
44.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) came in at $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)Iris Pro Graphics 580
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Skylake GT4e
Release
May 28 2019
September 1 2015
Ranking
#672
#707
Search Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on AmazonSearch Iris Pro Graphics 580 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.