Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro V7800 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro V7800 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Performance Spectrum

FirePro V7800
4 GB 150
2,028
+1.4%
brand logoRadeon HD 4850 X2
brand logoRadeon HD 5770
brand logoRadeon 630
brand logoRadeon R7 M465X
brand logoRadeon RX Vega M GH
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Shared System RAM 12
2,000
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V7800 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V7800

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V7800 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1150% higher power demand at 150W vs 12W.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 12W instead of 150W, a 138W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $759 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V7800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,028 vs 2,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro V7800 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
G3D Mark Score
2,028+1%
2,000
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
1280+1900%
64
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V7800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) carries 0 MB. FirePro V7800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7800 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
DirectX
11.2
12 (12_1)+7%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Encoder
None
QuickSync
Decoder
UVD 2.3
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
TDP
150W
12W-92%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
13.5
166.7+1135%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V7800 came in at $759, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($759 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro V7800) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V7800Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
MSRP
$759
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
Infinity
Codename
Cayman
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Release
May 24 2011
May 28 2019
Ranking
#656
#672
Search FirePro V7800 on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.