FirePro V7800 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
FirePro V7800
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V7800 is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $96 for the FirePro V7800, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 531.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+531.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7800 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7800 scores 2,028 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7800) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,028+1% | 2,000 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+1900% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V7800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 0 MB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7800) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7800) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7800 draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7800) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 12W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 166.7+1135% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $96, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 84.4% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.1 (FirePro V7800) vs 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 531.8% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7800 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $96 | $15-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 133.3+532% |
| Codename | Cayman | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #656 | #672 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V7800 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
