Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $50 for the GeForce GTX 460 SE, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 235.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+235.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 1,988 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 288+350% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-92% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 210mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+1153% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 234.9% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+235% | 39.8 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF104 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #672 | #683 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and GeForce GTX 460 SE
